Clinical governance: the 7 pillars, how to run them, and what CQC Regulation 17 requires
For quality, governance and clinical leads and managing directors at CQC-registered providers in England: what clinical governance means, the 7 pillars and the evidence each one leaves, how to run it, and what Regulation 17 requires, with a free framework.
What it is: Clinical governance is the system a healthcare provider uses to answer for the quality and safety of its care and to keep improving it. The Department of Health defined it in July 1998 as “a framework through which NHS organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will flourish.”
Who is accountable: In law, the duty falls on the registered person, meaning the registered provider or its registered manager. CQC’s guidance says the governance system “must include scrutiny and overall responsibility at board level or equivalent”.
What CQC checks: The regulator checks governance against Regulation 17, good governance, which requires systems that assess, monitor and improve quality and safety, manage risk, keep accurate records and act on feedback. The regulation sits under six of the eight quality statements in the well-led key question.
The 7 pillars of clinical governance, and the evidence each one leaves
Published lists of the pillars differ. The National Audit Office sorted the parts of clinical governance into three groups in its 2003 report, and the NHS regulations for community pharmacies name components of their own, including information governance and premises standards. The seven below are the components the Commission for Health Improvement examined in every NHS trust it reviewed, as the National Audit Office set them out in that report. The pillars organise the work, and for a CQC-registered provider the legal duty behind them is Regulation 17.
The pillars work as one system. An incident can reveal a risk the register missed, show that a policy no longer matches current guidance, send staff for retraining and give the next audit something to check. In the 193 reviews the Commission had reported on by November 2002, its main concerns included audit with no link to risk management and research, and boards that “often did not receive and disseminate the information from clinical governance and service activities that allowed them to be proactive and strategic”.
1. Patient and public involvement
In a provider: people who use the service, their families and staff can give feedback and raise complaints, and the provider shows what changed as a result. Regulation 17 requires providers to “seek and act on feedback” on their services.
The evidence it leaves:
- A log of feedback and complaints, with the response to each and what changed
- Survey results, and the actions they led to
- Minutes that show the governance meeting discussed feedback
- How you tell people what changed because of their feedback
2. Clinical audit
In a provider: a planned programme of audits checks current practice against a set standard, and each audit leads to action and a re-audit. CQC’s guidance says audits “should be baselined against Regulations 4 to 20A”, and its dental guidance describes clinical audit as a review of current practice against “expected published standards”.
The evidence it leaves:
- The audit programme for the year, with owners and dates
- Each audit’s findings, its action plan and the actions completed
- Re-audit results that show whether the change held
3. Risk management
In a provider: the provider finds and scores the risks to people using the service and to staff, puts controls in place and learns from incidents. Regulation 17 requires systems to “assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others”, and CQC’s guidance expects measures “within a timescale that reflects the level of risk”.
The evidence it leaves:
- A risk register with an owner, a score, controls and a review date for each risk
- An incident log, with the response to each incident and the learning
- Records of each notifiable safety incident under the duty of candour (our duty of candour guide sets out the steps)
- A log of the statutory notifications sent to CQC
4. Clinical effectiveness
In a provider: care follows current evidence. Someone tracks new guidance and safety alerts, decides what changes in the service and checks outcomes. CQC’s guidance says providers “should read and implement relevant nationally recognised guidance”, and its GP guidance lists the monitoring and adoption of best practice, such as NICE guidance and medicines alerts, among the information to gather.
The evidence it leaves:
- A log of new guidance and alerts: who reviewed each one, the decision and any change to practice
- The outcomes you measure, and what you did when they fell short
- Peer review, where you use it
5. Staffing and staff management
In a provider: enough suitably qualified staff work each shift, recruitment checks are complete and managers deal with poor performance. Regulation 18 requires “sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons”, and CQC’s guidance says staffing levels and skill mix “must be reviewed continuously”.
The evidence it leaves:
- Reviews of staffing levels and skill mix, and what you changed
- Employment records for every member of staff, including the checks Regulation 19 requires
- Supervision and appraisal records
- How you handled concerns about a member of staff’s performance
6. Education and training
In a provider: every role gets the training it needs, refreshers stay in date, and professional staff get support to show their regulator they still meet its standards. Regulation 18 requires staff to “receive such appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal as is necessary” for their duties.
The evidence it leaves:
- A training matrix by role, with dates and gaps
- Induction records for new starters
- Retraining after an incident or a policy change, with proof the staff involved completed it
7. Use of information
In a provider: leaders see reliable data on quality and safety, and care records stay accurate and secure. CQC’s guidance says information should be “up to date, accurate and properly analysed and reviewed by people with the appropriate skills and competence to understand its significance”, and Regulation 17 requires “an accurate, complete and contemporaneous record in respect of each service user”.
The evidence it leaves:
- A regular quality report to the board or leadership team, with trends over time
- Audits of care records
- Data security arrangements, including the Data Security and Protection Toolkit where it applies
How to run clinical governance: owners, meetings, board reports and re-audit
Clinical governance works when each pillar has an owner, a regular meeting checks progress, leaders see the results, and every issue follows the same steps until a re-audit shows the change held.
Name an owner for each pillar
Regulation 17 puts the duty on the registered person, which means the registered provider or the registered manager. CQC’s guidance adds that the system “must include scrutiny and overall responsibility at board level or equivalent”. Under that duty, name a clinical governance lead and an owner for each pillar. In a small service, one person can own several.
The Department of Health’s 1998 model for NHS trusts gave the chief executive ultimate responsibility for the quality of services, named a senior clinician to make sure the governance systems were in place and working, and asked for regular quality reports to the board “given the same importance as monthly financial reports”.
Hold a governance meeting with a standing agenda
Meet on a fixed cycle, often enough to check each action before it falls overdue. A standing agenda brings every pillar up each time:
- Actions from the last meeting: done, overdue or stuck
- Incidents, complaints and feedback since then: themes, learning and what changed
- The risk register: new risks, changed scores and controls
- Audit results and the actions they raised
- New guidance and safety alerts, and the decision on each
- Training and staffing: gaps, overdue refreshers and vacancies
- Notifications sent to CQC, and duty of candour cases
- What goes to the board, and anything to escalate now
Minute each decision with an owner and a date.
Report to the board, and write it so CQC could read it
Give the board, or the leadership team in a smaller provider, a regular quality report: trends in incidents, complaints and audit results, the main risks and how they moved, overdue actions, and what changed because of them. Write it so it could go to CQC as it stands. Under Regulation 17(3), the regulator can ask for a written report on how you assess, monitor and improve quality and safety and manage risk, with your plans for improvement. You then have 28 days to send it, counted from the day after the request arrives.
If you provide NHS care, the national Freedom to Speak Up policy also promises staff that your most senior leaders receive a report on speaking up at least once a year. Our Freedom to Speak Up guide covers what goes in it.
Take every issue through the same steps, to a re-audit
An incident, a complaint, an audit finding or a safety alert starts the same cycle:
- Record it and respond in proportionMatch the response to the issue: a quick review for a minor one, a full investigation for a serious one. Services under the NHS Standard Contract follow the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework, which our PSIRF guide explains.
- Find the cause and decide what changesA policy, a process, training or the risk register.
- Give each action an owner and a dateCheck it at every governance meeting until it’s done.
- Make the changeUpdate the policy and check staff have read it, retrain the staff involved and update the risk register.
- Re-auditCheck the change held. CQC’s dental guidance ends its audit cycle the same way: “Repeat the audit cycle to measure what changes have occurred as a result of the action taken.”
- Report it and close itTell the governance meeting and the board what changed, and keep the evidence.
CQC’s guidance asks providers to show how they “used the information to make improvements and demonstrate that they have been made”. The re-audit gives you that proof. The Department of Health’s 1998 document gave an example of the cycle: where catheters lead to a higher than average rate of urinary tract infection, the clinical governance committee looks for the reasons, such as poor technique in fitting them, arranges training and tracks progress in reducing the infection rate.
If an assessment has already found gaps, our guide to moving from Requires Improvement to Good sets out a 90-day plan.
Free clinical governance framework, mapped to Regulation 17
The framework sets out who owns each part of clinical governance in your service, how you run it and how you meet each part of Regulation 17, in one document ready for your leadership team and your next inspection. It covers:
- Who is accountable: the registered provider, the registered manager, a clinical governance lead and an owner for each pillar
- The 7 pillars: what each one covers in your service and the evidence it leaves
- The governance meeting: its terms of reference and a standing agenda
- The quality report to your board or leadership team
- Regulation 17, part by part: the system that meets each requirement and the evidence it leaves
- The steps from an incident, complaint or audit finding to the re-audit that shows the change held
- A yearly audit programme
- How and when you review the framework
Request the free framework
Enter your work email and our team will be in touch within one working day to send you the clinical governance framework.
Request received
Thanks. Our team will be in touch within one working day to send the clinical governance framework.
Could not send that request
Something went wrong on our side. Please try again, or use our contact form and our team will send you the framework.
What CQC Regulation 17 requires, and how the regulator checks it
Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, good governance, is the legal duty behind clinical governance for every CQC-registered provider. In its own words:
17(1): “Systems or processes must be established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Part.”
17(2): those systems or processes must enable the registered person, in particular, to:
- (a) “assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the services provided in the carrying on of the regulated activity (including the quality of the experience of service users in receiving those services)”
- (b) “assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others who may be at risk which arise from the carrying on of the regulated activity”
- (c) “maintain securely an accurate, complete and contemporaneous record in respect of each service user, including a record of the care and treatment provided to the service user and of decisions taken in relation to the care and treatment provided”
- (d) “maintain securely such other records as are necessary to be kept in relation to” the people it employs and the management of the regulated activity
- (e) “seek and act on feedback from relevant persons and other persons on the services provided in the carrying on of the regulated activity, for the purposes of continually evaluating and improving such services”
- (f) “evaluate and improve their practice in respect of the processing of the information referred to in sub-paragraphs (a) to (e)”
17(3): the registered person must send CQC, “when requested to do so and by no later than 28 days beginning on the day after receipt of the request”, a written report on how, and to what extent, it meets 17(2)(a) and (b), with any plans it has to improve the standard of its services.
How CQC checks it
CQC’s guidance on the regulation, last updated on 16 May 2025, says providers “must have effective governance, including assurance and auditing systems or processes”. It expects:
- Scrutiny and overall responsibility “at board level or equivalent”
- Regular audits measured against Regulations 4 to 20A, including the experience of people who use the service where possible
- Up-to-date, accurate information that people with the right skills analyse and escalate when needed
- Proof of how the provider acted on what it found, and that the improvements happened
- Regular checks of progress against improvement plans, and action without delay when a plan falls behind
- Feedback from people who use the service, staff and others, and what the provider did with it
The guidance adds that a 17(3) request could include an action plan or, for adult social care, a Provider Information Return.
Only part of the regulation is a criminal offence: failing to send the 17(3) report on time. CQC can prosecute that failure without serving a warning notice first. The fixed penalty for it is £300. For the rest of Regulation 17, the regulator can take other regulatory action. CQC must also refuse registration to a provider that cannot satisfy it that it can and will continue to comply.
Regulation 17 and well-led
In CQC’s assessment framework, Regulation 17 sits under six of the eight quality statements in the well-led key question, including governance, management and sustainability. Our well-led guide covers each statement, the evidence to keep for it and how it’s scored. For GP practices, the regulator also looks at clinical governance when it judges how effective a practice is.
Our guide to CQC ratings shows how the well-led rating combines with the other four key questions, and our CQC inspection checklist sets out the governance evidence to have ready.
What clinical governance looks like in each setting
Regulation 17 applies to every provider registered with CQC. Each setting adds rules and guidance of its own.
Hospitals and clinics
Many independent hospitals and clinics engage doctors through practising privileges, so a hospital stays accountable for doctors it does not employ. The Medical Practitioners Assurance Framework, published by the Independent Healthcare Provider Network and refreshed in September 2022, says a provider’s board holds “the ultimate accountability” for the governance of its doctors, “whether employed or working on practising privileges”. It sets out a “ward-to-board” governance structure, with defined roles for the clinical governance committee and the medical advisory committee, and suggests a standing board agenda item on patient safety.
In NHS trusts, executive reviewers support CQC’s assessments of well-led. The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework applies to every service under the NHS Standard Contract, including NHS-funded care from independent providers.
Pharmacies
A registered pharmacy must meet the General Pharmaceutical Council’s standards, and the first principle covers governance: “The governance arrangements safeguard the health, safety and wellbeing of patients and the public.” The GPhC says governance arrangements include clear roles and accountabilities, the arrangements for managing risks, and the way the owner manages and runs the pharmacy.
A pharmacy that provides NHS pharmaceutical services in England must also take part in a clinical governance system under the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical and Local Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 2013. Its components include patient and public involvement, clinical audit, risk management, clinical effectiveness, staffing and staff management, information governance and premises standards. The risk management programme must include “a clinical governance lead person for each pharmacy”. The audit programme must include at least one clinical audit of the pharmacy’s own choosing each financial year, plus a clinical audit or a policy-based audit that NHS England specifies.
A pharmacy business that also registers a service with CQC has Regulation 17 to meet for that service. Our guide to GPhC inspections covers how the regulator checks its standards.
Dental practices
CQC’s dental guidance describes clinical governance as the system through which organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care, covering “quality assurance, quality improvement and risk and incident management”. The regulator says most breaches it finds in dental practices sit under the well-led key question, and that leaders can be the principal dentist, the nominated individual or a practice manager.
CQC’s dental audit guidance names three essential audits: infection prevention and control (decontamination), at least every 6 months; X-ray audits, which the radiation regulations (IRR17 and IR(ME)R 2017) require; and an accessibility audit under the Equality Act 2010. Audits of antimicrobial prescribing and record keeping are desirable. The regulator also treats peer review as “one of the hallmarks of a well led practice”. Our free dental CQC inspection checklist lists what to check for each quality statement.
Nursing homes
In a nursing home, the clinical side of governance covers the risks the regulations name: the safe management of medicines and infection control under Regulation 12, nutrition and hydration under Regulation 14, and safeguarding under Regulation 13. Regulation 18 requires the provider to enable its registered nurses to show their regulator, the Nursing and Midwifery Council, that they still meet its professional standards.
Care homes must notify the regulator of deaths, serious injuries, abuse and other events, and its Regulation 17 guidance says a 17(3) request could include a Provider Information Return. Our care home audit tool covers every quality statement, and our guides to CQC notifications and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards cover two more duties.
GP practices
CQC’s GP mythbuster on clinical governance, last updated in December 2022, says the regulator considers a practice’s clinical governance “when we make judgements about how effective and how well-led GP practices are”. It expects senior members of the practice to lead it and all staff to take part. It gives examples of the information to bring to governance discussions: unexpected deaths, new cancers and other life-changing diagnoses, significant events, complaints, NICE guidance and medicines alerts, patient feedback and surveys, prescribing performance, QOF and enhanced service data, clinical audit findings, and education and learning.
Where a practice lacks effective governance, CQC considers whether it meets Regulation 17.
Or show what changed after every incident, audit and risk
CompliantCare covers five of the seven pillars in one system, one of them in part. An incident updates the risk register, flags the policy it exposed for a redraft and assigns retraining to the staff involved, and the next audit confirms the fix held. Linked Intel shows the whole trail, from the incident to the evidence of what changed. When the board or an inspector asks what changed, one click produces the inspection pack.
| Pillar | CompliantCare module | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical audit | Audit Management | Turns every finding into an action with an owner and a deadline; the re-audit confirms the fix held |
| Risk management | Risk Management and Incident Management | Scores every risk on one model across every site, with a live, board-ready view; gives each incident a proportionate, PSIRF-aligned response and tracks duty of candour |
| Clinical effectiveness | Policy Management, in part | Drafts each policy from the regulations you fall under, and has a redraft ready when a rule changes |
| Education and training | Training Suite | Assigns retraining to the staff affected after an incident, a policy change or a lapsing refresher, and checks they understood it |
| Use of information | Inspection Readiness | Keeps a live readiness score drawn from your policies, audits, training, incidents and risk register, and produces the inspection pack in one click |
| Patient and public involvement | None | No CompliantCare module covers it |
| Staffing and staff management | None | No CompliantCare module covers it |
Common questions
What is clinical governance?
Clinical governance is the system a healthcare provider uses to answer for the quality and safety of its care and to keep improving it. The Department of Health defined it in July 1998 as "a framework through which NHS organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will flourish." Gabriel Scally and Liam Donaldson, then NHS regional directors, published a paper on it in the BMJ the same week. The regulator's guidance for dental practices uses nearly the same words for any organisation. For a CQC-registered provider, the legal duty behind it is Regulation 17, good governance.
What are the 7 pillars of clinical governance?
The seven pillars are patient and public involvement, clinical audit, risk management, clinical effectiveness, staffing and staff management, education and training, and the use of information. These are the seven components the Commission for Health Improvement examined in every NHS trust it reviewed, as the National Audit Office set them out in 2003. Published lists differ, and some name other parts, such as research or premises standards.
Who is responsible for clinical governance?
In law, it's the registered person: the registered provider or its registered manager. CQC's guidance says the governance system "must include scrutiny and overall responsibility at board level or equivalent". Day to day, name a clinical governance lead and an owner for each pillar. NHS pharmacies in England must have one for each pharmacy.
What is CQC Regulation 17?
Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 is good governance. It requires systems or processes that let a provider assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of its services, assess, monitor and mitigate risks, keep secure, accurate and complete records, and seek and act on feedback. Under 17(3), CQC can ask for a written report on how the provider assesses and improves quality and manages risk, with its plans for improvement. The provider has 28 days to send it, counted from the day after the request arrives.
What does CQC look for in clinical governance?
CQC's Regulation 17 guidance expects effective governance, including assurance and auditing systems; regular audits measured against Regulations 4 to 20A; scrutiny at board level or equivalent; and proof that the provider used what it learned to make improvements. The regulation sits under six of the eight quality statements in the well-led key question. For GP practices, CQC also looks at clinical governance when it judges how effective a practice is.
What is the difference between clinical governance and well-led?
Clinical governance is the system a provider runs to keep its care safe and improving. Well-led is one of CQC's five key questions, covering leadership, management and governance. Regulation 17, the legal duty behind clinical governance, sits under six of its eight quality statements.
What is a clinical governance framework?
A clinical governance framework is a document that sets out how a provider runs clinical governance: who is accountable, the meetings and reports, what each pillar covers and the evidence it leaves, and how the provider meets each part of Regulation 17. You can request our free framework for CQC-registered providers on this page.
What is an example of clinical governance?
CQC's dental audit guidance gives a worked example. A practice audits its X-rays against a standard of 90% diagnostically acceptable and finds 75% over the previous six weeks. It traces the problem to one surgery, where the X-ray machine's arm won't stay in place, has the machine serviced, and agrees to re-audit six weeks later to check the result improved.
What is clinical effectiveness in clinical governance?
Clinical effectiveness means care follows the best current evidence, and the provider checks that it does. In practice, someone tracks new guidance and safety alerts, such as NICE guidance and medicines alerts, decides what changes in the service, and measures outcomes. CQC's guidance says providers "should read and implement relevant nationally recognised guidance".
Does clinical governance apply to care homes?
Yes. Every CQC-registered care home must meet Regulation 17, good governance. In a nursing home, the clinical side covers the risks the regulations name, such as medicines, infection control, nutrition and hydration, and safeguarding. Regulation 18 requires the provider to enable its registered nurses to show their regulator that they still meet its professional standards.
References
- Department of Health: A first class service, Quality in the new NHS (HSC 1998/113, published 1 July 1998), UK Government Web Archive
- Department of Health: A First Class Service, Quality in the new NHS (the full document, PDF, as published by the Lampard Inquiry)
- Scally G and Donaldson LJ: Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England, BMJ, 4 July 1998
- National Audit Office: Achieving Improvements through Clinical Governance, a progress report on implementation by NHS trusts (HC 1055, 17 September 2003)
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: regulation 17, good governance
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: regulation 2, interpretation
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: regulation 12, safe care and treatment
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: regulation 18, staffing
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: regulation 22, offences
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: schedule 5, fixed penalty offences
- CQC: Regulation 17, good governance (guidance for providers)
- CQC: Regulation 18, staffing (guidance for providers)
- CQC: Well-led, the key question in the single assessment framework
- CQC: How we gather evidence
- CQC: GP mythbuster 65, effective clinical governance arrangements in GP practices
- CQC: Dental mythbuster 17, audit and improvement in primary dental services
- CQC: Dental mythbuster 27, well-led
- The National Health Service (Pharmaceutical and Local Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 2013: schedule 4, paragraph 28, clinical governance
- GPhC: Standards for registered pharmacies (June 2018)
- Independent Healthcare Provider Network: Medical Practitioners Assurance Framework, refresh (September 2022)
- NHS England: Applying the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework outside of NHS trusts (July 2024)
General information, not legal advice. It reflects our understanding of the regulations and of CQC's guidance as of October 2026, so check legislation.gov.uk and cqc.org.uk for the current position.
