Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards: what changed in June 2026, when to apply, and what CQC expects
For care homes and hospitals in England: the Supreme Court's ruling on what counts as a deprivation of liberty, how to judge each person's case now, the authorisation steps and time limits, and the notification CQC needs.
On 2 June 2026 the Supreme Court changed how to judge whether a person is deprived of their liberty. The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards still apply in care homes and hospitals, and the change took effect immediately. Where you’re in any doubt about a person’s arrangements, the government’s guidance says to keep using that process.
| What | What the law says now |
|---|---|
| Where DoLS applies | Care homes and hospitals in England, for people aged 18 and over. Elsewhere, the Court of Protection authorises it. |
| The test since 2 June 2026 | A range of factors, including the type, duration, effects and manner of the restrictions, and whether the person objects. The 2014 acid test no longer decides it. |
| Who asks | The care home or hospital (the managing authority) asks the local authority (the supervisory body). |
| Urgent authorisation | Given by the care home or hospital itself, in writing, for up to 7 days, with one extension of up to 7 days. |
| Standard authorisation | Six assessments within 21 days of the request; it lasts up to one year. |
| Telling CQC | Notify without delay once you know the outcome of a request, or if it’s withdrawn. |
What the Supreme Court changed on 2 June 2026
In [2026] UKSC 16, a unanimous Supreme Court overruled its own 2014 judgment in Cheshire West. That judgment set the “acid test”: a person who lacks capacity is deprived of their liberty when they’re under continuous supervision and control and not free to leave. The court called the acid test “wrong in principle”.
In its place, the court returned to the approach the European Court of Human Rights has applied for decades. Whether a person is deprived of their liberty depends on a range of factors, including the type, duration, effects and manner of the measures, and no single factor decides it.
The ruling also changed how consent works for this purpose. A person who lacks capacity, but who understands their living situation and shows they accept it, should have their view respected. Where there’s serious doubt, staff shouldn’t assume the person consents.
The Department of Health and Social Care says the change applies with immediate effect across the UK. CQC’s statement says the same, and that it will take a proportionate approach in its assessments while the health and care system works out the practical impact.
DHSC has promised further guidance with practical case studies and hasn’t published it yet. DHSC republished the 2008 DoLS code of practice on 2 June 2026, and says its Chapter 2 doesn’t fully reflect the ruling. We’ll update this guide when the new guidance arrives.
How to decide whether a person is deprived of their liberty now
DHSC’s guidance lists what to weigh for each person:
- The type of restrictions, such as locked doors, physical control, supervision, sedating medication and social isolation
- How long the restrictions last
- Their effects on the person, and the way they’re carried out
- Whether the person objects
- How far the situation is from detention in a prison cell
- How normal the arrangements are
- The purpose of the arrangements
For a deprivation of liberty, someone must impose restrictions on the person against their will. Any objection points towards a deprivation of liberty, and a person going along with their care doesn’t automatically mean they consent.
Where you’re in any doubt, the guidance says to keep using the DoLS process in care homes and hospitals, and the court process in other settings. When a person moves between appearing content and appearing to object, refer them to the local authority.
Signs that point towards a deprivation of liberty
DHSC gives these examples of a person objecting to their arrangements. Each one points towards a deprivation of liberty:
- Trying to leave the care home or hospital
- Covert medication when the person objects to their medication
- Physical restraint, or one-to-one care to manage their behaviour
Record how you weighed each factor for the person, and why you did or didn’t ask for an authorisation. DHSC asks local authorities to record clear decisions too, especially where an authorisation is left to lapse because a case no longer falls within DoLS.
How to apply for a DoLS authorisation, step by step
- Decide whether the person is, or is likely to be within the next 28 days, deprived of their liberty in your care home or hospital, using the factors above.
- Ask the supervisory body for a standard authorisation. That’s the local authority for the area where the person ordinarily lives.
- If the need is too urgent to wait, give an urgent authorisation yourself, in writing. It lasts up to 7 days, and the local authority can extend it once, by up to 7 days, for exceptional reasons.
- The local authority arranges six assessments: age, mental health, mental capacity, best interests, eligibility and no refusals. The assessors must complete them within 21 days of your request, or before an urgent authorisation ends.
- If every assessment is positive, the local authority grants the standard authorisation for up to one year and can attach conditions. It appoints a representative for the person.
- Explain to the person, both in speech and in writing, what the authorisation means, their right to challenge it in court and their right to ask for a review.
- Notify CQC of the outcome without delay.
- If the authorisation is still needed, ask for a new one before it expires, timed to start when the current one ends.
Request a mental capacity assessment form and DoLS tracker
Drop your email and the team will send a copy over.
Request received
Thanks. We will send the scoped copy to your inbox within one working day.
Could not send that request
Something went wrong on our side. Please try again, or use our contact form and we'll get the scoped copy over.
What to do about authorisations already in place
DHSC says that where a person with a DoLS authorisation is no longer deprived of their liberty under the new approach, their case should be reviewed as soon as practicable. Leaving the authorisation in place in the meantime doesn’t mean the person is unlawfully deprived of their liberty, and you can reduce restrictions without a review or a new authorisation.
As the managing authority, you must ask the local authority for a review when any of the requirements behind an authorisation appears to need one.
DHSC also asks care home providers and managers to share the ruling across their organisation, train their staff on it, and review their policies, protocols, websites and leaflets.
Request Free Mental Capacity Assessment Form and DoLS Tracker
What CQC expects, and the notification it needs
CQC’s assessments still look for three things. You consider, case by case, whether a person needs an authorisation. You give person-centred care and gather each person’s views about it. And you meet the Mental Capacity Act, including acting in the person’s best interests, whether or not they’re deprived of their liberty.
Consent to care and treatment is a separate question. The regulator says the judgment’s definition of valid consent doesn’t apply there, and that the Mental Capacity Act and Regulation 11, need for consent, haven’t changed. Its older guidance page on the Mental Capacity Act and DoLS, last updated in May 2022, still describes the 2014 test, so rely on its June 2026 statement and DHSC’s guidance.
Under Regulation 18 of the CQC (Registration) Regulations 2009, you must notify CQC without delay of the outcome of a request for a standard authorisation or of a Court of Protection application, or of its withdrawal. Failing to notify is a criminal offence, with a fine of up to £2,500 or a fixed penalty of £1,250 for a provider and £625 for a registered manager. Our guide to CQC notifications covers the others and their deadlines.
How long DoLS applications take: the 2024-25 figures
DHSC’s official statistics for England, published in March 2026, show for the year to 31 March 2025:
- 364,900 applications received, up 9.8% on the year before
- 58% of applications came with an urgent authorisation
- 118,850 applications not completed at the year end, down 4.0% from 123,790
- 126 days on average from receipt to completion, down from 144
- 21.1% of standard applications completed within the 21-day limit
- 97.5% of fully assessed applications granted
DHSC expects the ruling to reduce the number of authorisations significantly in the long term.
Where the Liberty Protection Safeguards stand
Parliament legislated for the Liberty Protection Safeguards in the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019, and the government has never brought them into force. In June 2026 the Supreme Court noted they’re “currently the subject of review”, and the government said DoLS “will continue to apply”. The government promised a consultation for 2026 and hadn’t published it by 21 October 2026.
Or show every team has read your updated DoLS policy, person by person
When your DoLS policy changes, CompliantCare’s Policy Management sends it to the right people and tracks acknowledgement per person, so read-and-understood is provable. Training Suite sends retraining to the staff a policy change affects, with a short check that they understood.
Common questions
What does DoLS mean in care?
DoLS stands for the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. They're the legal process, under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, for authorising care or treatment in a care home or hospital that deprives an adult of their liberty when they lack the capacity to consent to the arrangements. They apply to people aged 18 and over.
What changed with DoLS in 2026?
On 2 June 2026 the Supreme Court overruled its 2014 Cheshire West judgment and the acid test it set. Whether a person is deprived of their liberty now depends on a range of factors, including the type, duration, effects and manner of the restrictions. The court also said that a person without capacity who shows they accept their situation should have that respected. DHSC says the change applies with immediate effect.
Is the acid test still used?
No. DHSC's guidance says there is no longer an acid test. Its two factors, continuous supervision and control and not being free to leave, still count as part of the wider assessment, alongside the others the court listed.
Who applies for a DoLS authorisation?
The care home or hospital, as the managing authority, asks the local authority where the person ordinarily lives, the supervisory body, for a standard authorisation. When the need is urgent, the care home or hospital gives itself an urgent authorisation, in writing, for up to 7 days while the request is decided.
How long does a DoLS authorisation last?
A standard authorisation lasts as long as the best interests assessment recommends, up to one year. An urgent authorisation lasts up to 7 days, and the local authority can extend it once, by up to 7 days, for exceptional reasons. To continue after a standard authorisation ends, the care home or hospital asks for a new one, timed to start when the old one expires.
How long does a DoLS application take?
The law gives the local authority 21 days from the request to complete the assessments. In England in 2024-25, applications took 126 days on average from receipt to completion, and 21.1% of standard applications were completed within 21 days, according to DHSC's official statistics.
Does DoLS apply in supported living?
No. DoLS covers care homes and hospitals only. Where a person in supported living or their own home may be deprived of their liberty, the authorisation comes from the Court of Protection.
Have the Liberty Protection Safeguards replaced DoLS?
No. Parliament legislated for the Liberty Protection Safeguards in the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019, and the government has never brought them into force. After the June 2026 judgment, it said DoLS will continue to apply.
Do we have to tell CQC about a DoLS authorisation?
Yes. Under Regulation 18 of the CQC (Registration) Regulations 2009, you notify CQC without delay of the outcome of a request for a standard authorisation or of a Court of Protection application, or of its withdrawal. Failing to notify is a criminal offence.
What should we do about DoLS authorisations already in place?
DHSC says that where a person with an authorisation in place is no longer deprived of their liberty under the new approach, their case should be reviewed as soon as practicable. Leaving the authorisation in place in the meantime doesn't mean the person is unlawfully deprived of their liberty, and you can reduce restrictions without a review or a new authorisation.
References
- UK Supreme Court: [2026] UKSC 16, judgment given 2 June 2026
- DHSC: UK Supreme Court 2026 judgment on what constitutes a deprivation of liberty (interim guidance, updated 22 September 2026)
- CQC: Statement on the Supreme Court's judgment on deprivation of liberty (updated 16 June 2026)
- CQC: Quality statement, consent to care and treatment
- Mental Capacity Act 2005, Schedule A1: Hospital and care home residents, deprivation of liberty
- SI 2008/1858, regulation 13: Time frame for assessments
- Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009, regulation 18: Notification of other incidents
- DHSC: Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards, England, 2024 to 2025 (official statistics, 26 March 2026)
- UK Parliament: Written question HL636, answered 16 June 2026
For general information only. It reflects our understanding of the FCA's rules as of October 2026, so check fca.org.uk for the current rules.
