CQC well-led: the 8 quality statements, the evidence for each, and what outstanding takes
For registered managers, quality leads and directors in England: what CQC's well-led key question covers, examples of the evidence to keep for each quality statement, how it's scored today, and what CQC's draft 2026 frameworks say good and outstanding look like.
Well-led is the CQC key question about leadership, management and governance. Today the regulator assesses it through eight quality statements, each scored from 1 to 4. Its draft frameworks swap the statements for six or seven topics, depending on the sector. There’s no start date for them yet, so the current framework still applies.
| Quality statement | What CQC looks at | In the draft frameworks |
|---|---|---|
| Shared direction and culture | A vision, strategy and values that staff know and support | Strategic direction |
| Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders | Leaders’ skills, visibility and integrity, and succession plans | Capable and compassionate leaders |
| Freedom to speak up | Whether staff raise concerns, and whether leaders listen and act | Workforce equity and culture, and safety culture |
| Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion | Fair treatment of staff, and action on any gaps in their experience | Workforce equity and culture |
| Governance, management and sustainability | Clear accountability, risk and performance systems, data and notifications | Governance and management for adult social care; governance, and management of risk, performance and issues, for the other three sectors |
| Partnerships and communities | Joint work with partners, and learning shared both ways | Partnerships and communities |
| Learning, improvement and innovation | Improvement that’s measured, with people and staff involved | Improvement, innovation and learning |
| Environmental sustainability, sustainable development | Cutting the service’s carbon and environmental impact | Left out of the adult social care draft; part of strategic direction in the other three |
The regulator hasn’t published a mapping between the quality statements and the draft topics. The right-hand column is our reading of each draft topic’s scope, the same reading as our CQC framework crosswalk.
What well-led means to CQC
CQC’s framework describes a well-led service in two paragraphs: “There is an inclusive and positive culture of continuous learning and improvement. This is based on meeting the needs of people who use services and wider communities, and all leaders and staff share this. Leaders proactively support staff and collaborate with partners to deliver care that is safe, integrated, person-centred and sustainable, and to reduce inequalities.”
“There are effective governance and management systems. Information about risks, performance and outcomes is used effectively to improve care.”
Put simply, well-led asks whether leaders know what’s happening in their service and act on it. It covers the direction and culture leaders set, how they treat and listen to staff, the systems that track quality and risk, and how the service learns and improves.
How CQC gathers well-led evidence
Inspectors observe care and talk with people, staff and service leaders, on site or online. The regulator requests evidence directly from providers, most likely by email, and says providers don’t need to send evidence until it asks. Adult social care services also complete an annual provider information request. For NHS trusts, executive reviewers support CQC’s assessments of well-led.
The 8 well-led quality statements, and the evidence to keep for each
Each quality statement below starts with CQC’s own wording, then what it means in practice and examples of the evidence to have ready. Each one also lists the regulations behind it, and Regulation 17, good governance, sits under six of the eight. Our guide to clinical governance and Regulation 17 covers what the regulation requires and how to run it.
1. Shared direction and culture
“We have a shared vision, strategy and culture. This is based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and our communities in order to meet these.”
What it means: staff in every area know the vision, values and strategy, and how their own role helps achieve them. The strategy came from a structured planning process with people who use the service, staff and partners. Leaders know the risks to delivering it and keep a plan to deal with them.
Evidence to have ready:
- The written vision, values and strategy, with a record of how people who use the service, staff and partners shaped them
- Staff survey results or supervision notes that show staff can explain the vision and their part in it
- A plan for the risks to delivering the strategy, with dated progress reviews
- Workforce equality data, and the actions taken where it shows inequality
In the draft frameworks: strategic direction. Regulations: 10 (dignity and respect), 12 (safe care and treatment) and 17 (good governance), with 9 (person-centred care) to consider.
2. Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders
“We have inclusive leaders at all levels who understand the context in which we deliver care, treatment and support and embody the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. They have the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They do so with integrity, openness and honesty.”
What it means: leaders have the experience, capacity and integrity to deliver the vision and manage risk. They’re visible, lead by example and model inclusive behaviour. Safe, fair recruitment and succession planning keep leadership strong, and leaders deal quickly with any poor culture.
Evidence to have ready:
- Fit and proper person checks for directors and senior leaders
- A leadership structure that shows who is accountable for what
- Leaders’ appraisals, supervision and development records
- A succession plan for key roles
- Examples of leaders spotting poor culture, what they did and what changed
In the draft frameworks: capable and compassionate leaders. Regulations: 6 (where the provider is an organisation), 7 (registered managers), 18 (staffing) and 19 (fit and proper persons employed), with 4 (individual and partnership providers) and 5 (fit and proper persons: directors) to consider.
3. Freedom to speak up
“We foster a positive culture where people feel that they can speak up and that their voice will be heard.”
What it means: leaders encourage staff to raise concerns, and staff trust that leaders will listen. The service supports people who speak up, including external whistleblowers, and protects them from detriment. Leaders investigate sensitively and confidentially, share the lessons and act on them. When something goes wrong, people receive a sincere and timely apology.
Evidence to have ready:
- A speaking-up and whistleblowing policy, and how staff learn about it (our guide to writing a whistleblowing policy covers what goes in one)
- The name of the Freedom to Speak Up guardian, or another named person staff can go to (our Freedom to Speak Up guide covers who needs a guardian and what changed in 2026)
- A log of the concerns staff raised: how the service looked into each one, what it told the person and what changed
- Staff survey results on whether staff feel safe to speak up
- Records of the apologies given when things went wrong, and the actions that followed
In the draft frameworks: workforce equity and culture, with raising safety concerns under safety culture. Regulations: 10, 12 and 17, with 9 to consider.
4. Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion
“We value diversity in our workforce. We work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for us.”
What it means: leaders act where staff with protected characteristics, or from excluded and marginalised groups, have a worse experience, and they check whether the action worked. They remove bias from recruitment and employment practices, prevent and deal with bullying and harassment, and make reasonable adjustments for disabled staff.
Evidence to have ready:
- Workforce data by protected characteristic across recruitment, progression and disciplinary cases, and what you did about any gaps
- Bullying and harassment cases, how the service handled each one and what changed (our guide to the duty to prevent sexual harassment sets out the legal duty)
- Records of reasonable adjustments made for disabled staff
- Wellbeing and flexible working arrangements, and how staff use them
- Workforce Race Equality Standard and Workforce Disability Equality Standard returns, and gender pay gap reports, where they apply
In the draft frameworks: workforce equity and culture. Regulations: 17 and 18.
5. Governance, management and sustainability
“We have clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. We use these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. We act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and we share this securely with others when appropriate.”
What it means: governance, management and accountability are clear, staff understand their roles, and managers can account for the actions and performance of staff. Systems manage current and future risks to quality. Data and notifications reach external organisations as required, records are secure and reliable, and leaders use information to monitor and improve care.
Evidence to have ready:
- A governance structure: who reviews quality, safety and risk, how often, and the minutes and actions from those meetings
- A risk register with an owner, a review date and actions for each risk
- An audit programme, with findings and completed actions
- A log of the statutory notifications sent to CQC (our guide to CQC notifications lists each one and its deadline)
- Data security arrangements, including the Data Security and Protection Toolkit where it applies, and records management
- Business continuity and emergency plans, including for severe weather
- The current CQC rating, displayed as Regulation 20A requires
In the draft frameworks: governance and management for adult social care; the other three drafts split it into governance, and management of risk, performance and issues. Regulations: 17 and 20A (display of performance assessments), with 12 to consider.
6. Partnerships and communities
“We understand our duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so our services work seamlessly for people. We share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement.”
What it means: staff and leaders work openly with other organisations and agencies, so people get joined-up care. They share learning with people, communities and partners, and use those networks to find better ways of working.
Evidence to have ready:
- Notes from meetings with partners, such as the local authority, GPs and NHS services, and the actions agreed
- Examples of learning shared with partners, or taken from them, and the change it led to
- How people who use the service and the local community help shape it
- Feedback from partners about working with you
In the draft frameworks: partnerships and communities, unchanged. Regulations: 12 and 17, with 9 (person-centred care) to consider.
7. Learning, improvement and innovation
“We focus on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across our organisation and the local system. We encourage creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. We actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research.”
What it means: staff and leaders know how to make improvement happen and measure its impact. People who use the service, their families and carers help develop and judge improvements. The service learns when things go wrong and from good practice, and leaders make time to hear staff ideas.
Evidence to have ready:
- Improvement projects with a starting measure, the change made and the measured result
- A lessons-learned log from incidents, complaints and audits, showing what each changed
- Examples of people and families taking part in improvement work
- Staff suggestions, and what happened to them
- Involvement in research or improvement networks, and learning from deaths reviews where they apply
In the draft frameworks: improvement, innovation and learning, with the same scope. Regulations: 17, with 16 (complaints) to consider.
8. Environmental sustainability, sustainable development
“We understand any negative impact of our activities on the environment and we strive to make a positive contribution in reducing it and support people to do the same.”
What it means: staff and leaders understand climate change as a threat to health, keep a green plan and work to make their settings low carbon, energy efficient and less wasteful.
Evidence to have ready:
- A green plan or carbon reduction plan, with actions and dates
- The energy, travel and waste measures taken, such as recycling and lower-carbon choices
- How staff learn to reduce the service’s environmental impact
In the draft frameworks: left out of adult social care; part of strategic direction for mental health, primary care and community services, and hospitals.
Our guide to the CQC safe key question covers its eight quality statements the same way.
Request the CQC well-led evidence checklist
Drop your email and the team will send a copy over.
Request received
Thanks. We will send the scoped copy to your inbox within one working day.
Could not send that request
Something went wrong on our side. Please try again, or use our contact form and we'll get the scoped copy over.
How CQC scores well-led today
CQC scores each quality statement it assesses from 1 to 4. A 1 means the evidence shows “significant shortfalls”, a 2 “some shortfalls”, a 3 “a good standard” and a 4 “an exceptional standard”. With eight statements, well-led has a maximum score of 32. CQC divides the total by that maximum and reads the rating from the percentage.
| Well-led score | Rating |
|---|---|
| 25 to 38% | Inadequate |
| 39 to 62% | Requires improvement |
| 63 to 87% | Good |
| 88% and above | Outstanding |
Two limits apply. If the percentage falls in the good range and any statement scores 1, well-led is rated requires improvement. If it falls in the outstanding range and any statement scores 1 or 2, the rating stops at good.
Say six well-led statements score 3 and two score 4. That’s 26 out of 32, or 81%, so well-led is rated good. Raise three of the 3s to 4s and it’s 29 out of 32, or 91%, which is outstanding. Our guide to CQC ratings shows how the five key questions combine into the overall rating.
Scoring is set to go with the new frameworks. In March 2026, CQC said consultation feedback supported its proposal to remove scoring and make rating judgements directly at key question level, which the rating characteristics will support.
What good and outstanding look like in the draft frameworks
The draft frameworks describe each rating for each topic, in what CQC calls rating characteristics. The regulator wrote them by first asking people what good care looks like, then describing the other ratings around that. They’re drafts and may change before they start. They’re also the plainest account yet of what CQC will look for.
The lines below come from the adult social care draft, version 9. The mental health, primary care and community services, and hospitals drafts ask some questions in different words, and each topic lists more characteristics than we quote here.
Strategic direction
CQC’s question: “Is there a clear vision and strategy to support the current and future needs of people and promote a positive culture?”
Good:
- “Leaders promote a shared vision and strategy that staff and people understand and support.”
- “The vision, values, and strategy have been developed through structured planning and co-production with people who use the service, staff and partners.”
Outstanding:
- “Staff are proud of the service as a place to work and speak highly of its culture, vision and values.”
- “Strategic plans are ambitious, challenging and innovative as well as being realistic and achievable.”
Workforce equity and culture
CQC’s question: “Is there an inclusive and compassionate culture that values diversity, supports staff wellbeing and speaking up, and tackles workforce inequalities?”
Good:
- “Leaders of the service set and review their performance against equality, diversity and inclusion objectives.”
- “Staff and volunteers are actively encouraged to give feedback, raise concerns, and contribute to improvements through formal speaking up processes.”
Outstanding:
- “Staff wellbeing is a strategic priority, with programmes in place to promote and support it.”
- “Leaders can demonstrate the positive outcomes and impacts of the actions they have taken to reduce identified workforce inequalities.”
Capable and compassionate leaders
CQC’s question: “Do leaders at all levels have the capability and experience to lead effectively and deliver high-quality care, with accountability, integrity and empathy?”
Good:
- “People say the service is well-led, with leaders who are approachable and responsive.”
- “Where required, there is a registered manager in post.”
Outstanding:
- “Leaders model empathy, active listening, and inclusive decision-making.”
- “There is a deeply embedded system of leadership development and succession planning.”
Governance and management
CQC’s question: “Are there clear roles, responsibilities and systems of accountability to support good governance and manage risks, performance and issues?”
Good:
- “Data or notifications are consistently submitted to external partners as required.”
- “The service has an accurate statement of purpose that clearly reflects current service provision.”
- “There are thorough business continuity plans in place for emergencies or natural disasters, such as adverse weather events, and staff know how to put these into practice.”
Outstanding:
- “Governance arrangements are proactively reviewed and reflect good practice.”
- “The service has well-designed, good practice information systems and processes. These provide reliable, timely and relevant information which is used in reporting, performance management and care delivery, facilitating improvement and innovation.”
The other three drafts split this topic in two. Governance asks: “Are there clear roles, responsibilities and systems of accountability to support good governance?” Management of risk, performance and issues asks: “Are there clear and effective processes for managing risks, performance and issues?”
Partnerships and communities
CQC’s question: “Is the service working effectively and collaboratively with people who use the service and partners to support care provision and service development?”
Good:
- “Staff and leaders work in partnership with people and other organisations, so that services work as seamlessly as possible for people.”
- “The service maintains positive relationships with the local community and works well with community partners.”
Outstanding:
- “Co-production is embedded in the service’s culture, with diverse voices actively shaping decisions.”
- “The service is embedded in the community it serves and is considered a valued partner by others in the community.”
Improvement, innovation and learning
CQC’s question: “Does the service enable and embed continuous improvement, innovation and learning, using evidence and lived experience?”
Good:
- “Learning is a continuous part of improvement and innovation, including good and poor outcomes for people and the impact.”
- “Staff and leaders engage with external work, including research, and embed evidence-based good practice in the service.”
Outstanding:
- “There is a fully embedded and systematic approach to quality improvement, which leaders understand is key to delivering high-quality care.”
- “Rigorous and constructive challenge from people who use services and stakeholders is welcomed and seen as a vital way of holding the service to account.”
What changes for well-led under CQC’s new frameworks
CQC published four draft frameworks on 24 March 2026, one each for adult social care, mental health, primary care and community services, and hospitals. Feedback closed on 12 June 2026, and the regulator piloted the drafts with providers over the summer. Its latest update, on 27 August 2026, plans more sector-by-sector engagement this autumn and gives no start date. Until the new approach starts, CQC asks providers to “continue to refer to the current published guidance on how we assess quality and performance”.
Well-led stays one of the five key questions. Its eight quality statements become six topics in the adult social care draft and seven in the other three, each with a key line of enquiry and rating characteristics. Four changes stand out:
- Freedom to speak up loses its own topic. Speaking up and whistleblowing move into workforce equity and culture, and raising safety concerns into safety culture, under safe.
- Environmental sustainability leaves the adult social care draft. CQC: “We have not included environmental sustainability in the draft adult social care assessment framework.” The other three drafts keep it inside strategic direction.
- Governance splits in two outside adult social care, into governance, and management of risk, performance and issues.
- Workforce equity and culture takes in staff wellbeing, which sits under the caring key question today.
Evidence organised around the five key questions carries across. Evidence filed under the eight quality statement names will need remapping to the new topics. Our free CQC framework crosswalk maps every current quality statement to the draft topics, sector by sector, and our guide to CQC’s new assessment frameworks tracks what CQC publishes next.
Or have your well-led evidence ready before the inspector asks
CompliantCare’s Inspection Readiness maps every requirement in your framework to the evidence behind it, drawn live from your policies, audits, training, incidents and risk register. When an inspector asks, one click produces the inspection pack: every policy, audit, record and action.
Common questions
What does well-led mean in CQC?
Well-led is the CQC key question about leadership, management and governance. The regulator's framework describes "an inclusive and positive culture of continuous learning and improvement" and "effective governance and management systems", where information about risks, performance and outcomes is used to improve care.
What are the 8 well-led quality statements?
Shared direction and culture; capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders; freedom to speak up; workforce equality, diversity and inclusion; governance, management and sustainability; partnerships and communities; learning, improvement and innovation; and environmental sustainability, sustainable development.
What are examples of evidence for well-led?
Minutes and actions from the meetings where leaders review quality and risk, a risk register with owners and review dates, a log of the concerns staff raised and what happened next, workforce equality data and the actions it led to, a record of the statutory notifications sent to CQC, and improvement projects with measured results. The regulator asks providers for evidence when it needs it, most likely by email, and talks to staff and leaders.
How is well-led scored?
CQC scores each of the 8 quality statements from 1 to 4, so the maximum is 32, and turns the total into a percentage: 25 to 38% is inadequate, 39 to 62% requires improvement, 63 to 87% good, and 88% and above outstanding. A score of 1 on any statement limits a good result to requires improvement, and a score of 1 or 2 limits an outstanding result to good.
Is the well-led key question changing?
Yes, when CQC brings in its new sector frameworks. In the drafts published on 24 March 2026, well-led has six topics for adult social care and seven for mental health, primary care and community services, and hospitals, each with a key line of enquiry and rating characteristics. CQC piloted the drafts over the summer, and its latest update, on 27 August 2026, gives no start date.
What is the well-led KLOE?
KLOE stands for key line of enquiry. CQC's frameworks used them until 2023, and the draft frameworks bring them back as one question per topic. For governance, the adult social care draft asks: "Are there clear roles, responsibilities and systems of accountability to support good governance and manage risks, performance and issues?"
Does freedom to speak up stay in well-led?
In the drafts it loses its own topic. Speaking up and whistleblowing move into workforce equity and culture, under well-led, and raising safety concerns into safety culture, under safe.
References
- CQC: Well-led, the key question in the single assessment framework
- CQC: Shared direction and culture (quality statement)
- CQC: Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders (quality statement)
- CQC: Freedom to speak up (quality statement)
- CQC: Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion (quality statement)
- CQC: Governance, management and sustainability (quality statement)
- CQC: Partnerships and communities (quality statement)
- CQC: Learning, improvement and innovation (quality statement)
- CQC: Environmental sustainability, sustainable development (quality statement)
- CQC: How we reach a rating
- CQC: How we gather evidence
- CQC: Draft sector-specific assessment frameworks (adult social care draft version 9, and the mental health, primary care and community services, and hospitals drafts)
- CQC: Our March update (24 March 2026)
- CQC: May 2026 update on improving how we work
- CQC: August 2026 update on improving how we work
For general information only and reflects our understanding of CQC's approach as of October 2026. The framework is changing during 2026, so always check cqc.org.uk for the current framework for your sector.
